All Plans & Reports

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $348.9 million in funds received by California Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Leon Snead & Co., audited EAC's financial statements as of September 30, 2009, and for the year then ended. This letter discusses matters involving internal control and other operational matters for management's attention.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Leon Snead & Company, P.C., audited EAC's financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Leon Snead & Co., conducted an evaluation of EAC's compliance with the requirements of the Federal Information Security Management Act for fiscal year 2009.

This report includes EAC OIG’s independent assessment of the top management challenges facing EAC in fiscal year 2010.

EAC OIG conducted an evaluation of EAC's purchase of shirts and zip-hooded sweatshirts as an award to its employees using appropriated funds. The objectives of the evaluation were to determine whether (1) the purchase of shirts complied with federal requirements and other guidance, and (2) the use of appropriated funds was permissible.

The 2010-2015 strategic plan outlines the vision and priorities that guide EAC OIG as it carries out its mission.

This report summarizes the oversight work performed by EAC OIG during the 6-month period ended September 30, 2009.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $16.6 million in funds received by the Rhode Island Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act.

EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $28.7 million in funds received by the Iowa Secretary of State under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Secretary of State (1) used payments authorized by Sections 101 and 251 of HAVA in accordance with HAVA and applicable requirements; (2) Accurately and properly accounted for property purchased with HAVA payments and for program income; and (3) met HAVA requirements for Section 251 funds for an election fund and for a matching contribution.