EAC OIG audited $39.2 million in funds received by the South Carolina Election Commission under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether South Carolina (1) expended HAVA payments in accordance with the Act and related administrative requirements and (2) complied with the HAVA requirements for replacing punch card or lever voting machines, for establishing an election fund, for appropriating a 5 percent match for requirements payments, and for maintaining stat expenditures for elections at a level not less than expended in fiscal year 2000. Specifically, we audited claimed expenditures from July 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, and reviewed controls to assess their adequacy over the expenditure of HAVA funds. We also evaluated compliance with certain administrative requirements for the following activities: accumulating financial information reported to EAC on the Financial Status Reports (standard forms number (269); accounting for property; purchasing goods and services; accounting for salaries; charging indirect costs; and spending by counties. We also determined whether South Carolina had complied with the requirements in HAVA applicable to Section 251 requirements payments for: Establishing and maintaining the election fund; appropriating funds equal to five percent of the amount necessary for carrying out activities financed with Section 251 requirements payments; and sustaining the State's level of expenditures for elections.
Administration of Payments Received Under the Help America Vote Act by the South Carolina Election Commission
Report Information
Status of Recommendations
We recommend that EAC resolve the questioned costs of $92,506.
We recommend that the EAC ensure that the South Carolina State Election Commission requires all counties to comply with the Federal equipment management requirements.
We recommend that the EAC require the South Carolina State Election Commission deposit state funds of $114,794 ($85,319 under match plus interest of $29,475) into the state election fund.
We recommend EAC require South Carolina to identify its base year expenditures for activities related to HAVA Section 251 requirements payments, and the annual expenditures for these activities for subsequent fiscal years.
We recommend that EAC identify any appropriate actions to be taken based on the information submitted by South Carolina.
We recommend that EAC require the Department to identify its base year expenditures for activities related to HAVA Section 251 requirements payments and annual expenditures for these activities for the fiscal years 2003 and 2004.
We recommend that EAC identify any appropriate actions to be taken based on the information submitted by the Department.